REF 2014: Picking through the results

REF 2014 Computing and Informatics Results, ordered by 4*/3* outputs and scaled by staff numbers
(Source: http://staff.city.ac.uk/~jwo/refviewer/). 

For the past two years, academics in UK universities have been preparing and then waiting for the results of the Research Excellence Framework (REF 2014), a quality audit of selected academic research undertaken during the period 2008-2013.  The results were finally published during the very early hours of 18 December, and there has been a flurry of activity as each university and department figures out how to interpret them in a way that reflects best on their performance.

At the OU, the Centre for Research in Computing was returned under the "Computer Science & Informatics" unit of assessment (UoA).  The research was produced by academics in the Department of Computing and Communications and the Knowledge Media Institute.  The REF 2014 panel's assessment was that 75% of our research outputs were 4* (world-leading) or 3* (internationally-excellent).  This is a good result, considering that our equivalent performance in the last assessment exercise, the RAE 2008, was to have just 70% of research outputs rated at 4*/3*.  As noted in the official announcement on the CRC website, the improvement in the OU's computing research outputs was accompanied by "an excellent research environment (100% rated world-leading or internationally-excellent), and a 30% larger submission (31 FTE, up from 24 in 2008)".  Despite this improved performance, other departments have done even better and as a result our position in the basic rankings has moved down to 31st (compared to joint 16th in 2008).

The chart above shows an alternative ranking based on 4*/3* outputs and scaled by staff numbers, and on this criteria OU Computing research moves into the top 20!  While this ranking is unlikely to get much acceptance, it does demonstrate the effect of different strategies for returning staff on the outcome. The chart was generated using the REF visualisation tool produced by Prof. Jo Wood from City University.  A more in depth analysis of the overall REF results was published by Research Fortnight (Hat tip to Anthony Finkelstein - @profserious - for sharing the link to this).

On a lighter note, Times Higher Education has set up a Twitter hashtag #REFrhymes, which has attracted a some funny contributions.  I particularly liked the following limerick:

 Note: The opinions and conclusions in this article are entirely my own and do not represent the views of The Open University.  You can find complete coverage of the REF results from The Open University on the university website: http://www.open.ac.uk/research/main/.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cloud Wedge - geek of the week

Image
CloudWedge: 'Geek of the Week' My colleague Yijun Yu recently wrote a opinion piece for The Conversation about how cloud computing could have made a difference to the search for Malayian Airlines MH370.  Essentially the question he poses is: why, in the age of global internet connectivity (including now onboard planes!), do we depend on the onboard flight data recorder for information about what happens on a plane? Of course there are numerous challenges with this - not least the cost of bandwidth for all the flight data (including cockpit audio) to be uploaded in real time and the security of the data.  Yijun's article addresses some aspects of the latter, and the former is not an insurmountable problem.  For example it should be possible to upload basic flight telemetry (e.g., GPS location, air speed, engine statistics and fuel data) without requiring significant bandwidth.  Indeed aero engine manufacturers such as Rolls-Royce deployed engine monitoring systems
Read more

Priming Code Club

Code Club Assembly Presentation from akbandara As part of my work with STEMnet, I recently signed up as a CodeClub volunteer at St. Bernadette's Catholic Primary School in Milton Keynes.  Working with Kate Clarke, the ICT leader at the school, I am going to be leading an after-school club that will introduce kids in Year 5 and Year 6 to the exciting world of programming.  CodeClub is a nationwide, volunteer driven, grass-roots movement to get kids learning about the fun that can be had programming computers, rather than simply using them. In order to give the kids some idea about what they might be letting themselves in for, last week I delivered the short presentation (embedded above) at the school.  I started out by getting the kids to identify different computers, and think about what a computer really does, i.e. follows a set of instructions to complete a task.  We then played with a neat little iPad game called 'Kodable' which allows the player to progr
Read more

Are we losing the Internet Security battle?

Image
I was recently invited by Heimdal Security to take part in an expert roundup, with the theme of "Is Internet Security a Losing Battle?".   The main thrust of my answer was to question our use of analogies of conflict in the context of Internet Security or cyber security.  As I said in my response: "... in this context the metaphors of conflict, such as ‘war’ and ‘battle’ are unhelpful because they suggest that internet security is the responsibility of the technologists who act our defensive force against attackers.   Instead, as has been argued by technology activists like Cory Doctorow  and others we might have more success by thinking of cyber security using the analogy of public health and communicable diseases.   By using this analogy, we make cyber security issues more relevant to people and spur them to gain a better understanding that, like diseases, any of us can be afflicted by a cyber security attack.  We can also adopt an analogous approach for han
Read more